Secure & SSL encryptedAdvertiser Disclosure
Tactical Wealth GuardDefend Your Wealth
Home/Comparisons/Birch Gold Group vs Cedar Gold Group

Birch Gold Group vs Cedar Gold Group

A side-by-side look at how these two Gold IRA providers compare for 2026. Figures are typical reported terms; verify current details with each provider.

BGG

Birch Gold Group

★ 4.6 · #4
Visit Site
CGG

Cedar Gold Group

★ 4.6 · #5
Visit Site
Birch Gold GroupCedar Gold Group
Our rating4.6 / 54.6 / 5
Minimum$10,000Provided on request
Setup fee$50$0
Annual fee$200 flat ($100 storage + $100 admin)Itemized quote on request
StorageSegregated (Equity Trust / STRATA)Segregated (Delaware Depository, Lloyd's-insured)
BuybackStandardLifetime
In business2003Newer entrant
Rating bodyA+Trustpilot 4.4
MetalsGold, Silver, Platinum, PalladiumGold, Silver, Platinum, Palladium
Birch Gold Group
  • ✓ In business 20+ years (since 2003)
  • ✓ All four IRS-approved metals
  • ✓ Flat fees (better for larger accounts)
  • ✕ Flat fees weigh more on very small accounts
Cedar Gold Group
  • ✓ $0 account setup
  • ✓ Lifetime buyback commitment
  • ✓ All four IRS-approved metals
  • ✕ Newer brand with a thinner public review record
  • ✕ Minimum and full fee schedule provided on request

How to think about the two

Birch Gold Group tends to appeal to investors who value in business 20+ years (since 2003), while Cedar Gold Group stands out for $0 account setup. The right fit depends on your account size, how much you value education versus the lowest fees, and which storage and buyback terms matter most to you. This is educational information, not a recommendation of one over the other.

Not sure which fits you?

Answer two quick questions and get matched with the providers that fit your situation, then choose who sends you a free guide.

Get matched free →

Advertiser disclosure: we may earn a commission when you visit a partner through links on this page. This does not affect our editorial ratings. Educational information only, not financial, tax, or investment advice.

More comparisons